Site icon CASE LAW

Criminal Law

A (Children) (Conjoined Twins) [2000] EWCA Civ 254, [2001] 1 FLR 267, [2000] 4 All ER 961, [2001] Fam 147, [2001] 2 WLR 480, [2001] [Report] [Video] (Mens rea, oblique intent, defence of necessity)

Barton and Booth v R [2020] EWCA Crim 575 [Report] [Video] (Mens rea, dishonesty, theft, precedent)

Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1969] 1 QB 439. [Report] [Video] (Actus reas/mens rea coincidence).

R v Dudley and Stephens QBD 9 Dec 1884 [Report] (Defence of necessity)

R v G and Another [2003] UKHL 50, [2004] 1 AC 1034. [Report] [Video] (Mens rea, definition of recklessness). 

R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8, [2017] AC 387. [Report] [Video – to follow]

R v Kennedy (No 2) [2007] UKHL 38, [2008] 1 AC 269. [Report] [Video] (Actus reas, novus actus, causation). 

R v Miller [1982] UKHL 6, [1983] 2 AC 161.  [Report] [Video] (Actus reas, omission liability).

R v R [1991] UKHL 12, [1992] AC 599, [1991] 4 All ER 481. [Report] [Video]  (Includes discussion of resulting ECtHR cases of SW v UK and CR v UK – reference on Constitutional Law Page of the website). (Matrimonial rape exemption).

R v Woollin [1998] UKHL 28, [1999] AC 82, [1998] 3 WLR 382, [1998] 4 All ER 103, [1998] [Report] [Video] (mens rea – oblique intention)

 

Exit mobile version